stoice Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 I don't really eat fish (Apart from the battered kind with chips! ) so I have a fishy question. I work as a packaging artworker (Bit like a graphic designer) Basically i set all the copy that goes on the products packaging, with it's design and make it print-ready. Ok bear with me - it's chicken related I promise! Well I'm in the middle of a canned fish range, there are loads to artwork! Anyway, I've noticed that some of the Tuna tins do not have omega 3 whereas the salmon has omega 3 AND vitamin D. Do you think that a tin of skinless and boneless salmon with no added salt would be beneficial for the chooks? I'm thinking as a boost of protein but also the omega 3 would help with the eggs contents and the Vitamin D would help with calcium absorbing. What do you guys think? Pampered chooks getting tinned salmon... sh, don't tell the OH!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egluntyne Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 I don't see why not. I'd give it a try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancing cloud Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 I've been giving my ex-batts tuna for a couple of weeks now, as it was recommended for helping their feathers grow. They love it , but fat Puddy is utterly distraught at them getting her very favourite food on the planet and has installed some kind of alarm system in the kitchen so every time I open tuna, she's at my feet begging shamelessly. I'm sure salmon would be excellent for the scoffalots, but I have a feeling Pud would suffocate me in my sleep if I gave them that as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
