Sheilaz Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Just saw we were the last 2 on line....and we've both gone to bed! ....Er, couldn't wait to see how this topic developed!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Just posted the explanation on another thread, but I forget which one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheilaz Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Just read it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cate in NZ Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 When I spoke to Simon way back at the beginning of October he had never visited the forum, and didn't have a clue about all the variety of conversations going on on here That said it was before his bottom took such a starring role in so many of the postings He did say that James spent quite a bit of time on it, giggling away at our chatter, and I recommended that he had a look himself when he got a chance Wonder if he ever did come and have a look, or if we've all scared him away completely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Maybe he is one of the hidden peeps you see from time to time lurking in the background Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Whenever I go over there he has his head down and is working furiously! Probably doesn't have time to look at the forum, which I think is James' baby. Shame, he is missing out on some great stuff, but it's also a great time-waster in the nicest possible sense. It's my 'work avoidance process'! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mel (& Paul) Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Thanks you guys. Desperately trying to get some reports done. Have now got completely caught up in the pants debate (caught up in the debate not the pants....) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Well, looks like we might not need to get James to send some pants from the Mothership (HQ) as grd seems to be getting his own. Unless that is a ruse to throw us off the scent! Kate, any way of checking if he has actually placed the order? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mel (& Paul) Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 I am SO glad that I am not your enemy! - there's no stopping you is there?!?!?!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 'Be Frayed, be very Frayed'! As I saw once somewhere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Frugal Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Y-fronts ? Dan ??? Horrible!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cate in NZ Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Thank you for sharing that with us Dan Comfort over style eh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Frugal Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Not if you wear those lovely clingy jersey ones. Mmmmmm. LSH wears them and they are NICE !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 What on earth do men need support in their pants for? You thought that you'd be safe as they don't do any Omlet Y fronts WRONG We need to be able to compare your botties with Simon's, so to make sure that this experiment has all the necessary scientific controls, you chaps need to pose in the boxers! Louise will back me up on this - she's a scientist! If you guys send in the pics, I'll get my back out! Kate, we really must get all these together for a calendar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Better start those clenching exercises now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cate in NZ Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Mine wears similar; jersey boxers, clingy but with a silky texture from M&S. Streamlined and strokeable Mind, I'm the one that ends up shopping for them.... so I get to choose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Frugal Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Streamlined and strokeable Good description Kate !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popcorn Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Mine wears similar; jersey boxers, clingy but with a silky texture from M&S. Streamlined and strokeable Do work for advertising in M&S Kate? That was a good sales pitch if ever I heard one..... I might have to go and search them out for OH now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Frugal Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 They are VERY NICE Gina !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Better start those clenching exercises now.... Don't need any! Ooooo, get you! We'll be the judge of that Dan! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Sounds like both the Kates have their OH's weraing the same type of pants! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cate in NZ Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Goes with the name quite obviously Clare (Along with chickens, nurses uniforms and Marillion concerts ) Sorry, I didn't really mean to do an advertising job for M&S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lesley Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Have to agree about the M&S ones - very strokeable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Doubt that I'll get The Boy in any - he's a pants man like Dan - no boxies for him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lesley Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 But they're not boxers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
