gooner.girl Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 It makes sense really. Hire a decent motivating manager with balls and you'll see results. Jose Mourinho?!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Couperman Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 I think it is a disgrace that you are criticising Scott Carson. If it wasn't for him it would have been 5-1. Why is "Ooops, word censored!"ody blaming Frank Lampard, Steven Gerrard, Jolean Lescott, Wayne Bridge, Sol Campbell? Doesn't make sense to me. England's number 1 for the long term. "Ooops, word censored!"ody is blaming Scott Carson, we are all blaming the fool who picked him! I am sure he is a great keeper but that was not the game to introduce a young lad to the England set up. The game was far too important. He should have been introduced long before when Robinson was first showing signs of wobblyness. He should have played David James, I know he is prone to the odd error but he has been around long enough to take it on the chin and not have sleepless nights about it for the rest of his career. The England squad need to take a long hard look at themselves, as do the press. England simply are not good enough, they think they have a divine right to be at every tournament. I hope Scott learns from his baptism of fire and goes on to be the No1 he should be "Ooops, word censored!"ody could think of a comedian that rhymed with Steve McClaren other than the obvious ......................................Steve McClaren. Kev. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickencam Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 I agree we were having a go at the whole system and there are lots of word play opportunities with scott carson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickencam Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 We've got to cheer ourselves up somehow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
