Cinnamon Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 LINKY THINGY Seen again,the second time this week,wearing monstrous heels (7inches!) & carrying her clearly adored new baby daughter. Got her priorities a bit mixed up if you ask me ..... no child she be risked like that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griffin Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 It saddens me too. She could seriously injure if not kill that baby if she tripped or fell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LolaLayla Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 I saw her wearing pumps and holding the baby and thought that she was being sensible. But when I saw the photo with her wearing the high heels I really couldn't believe that anyone would risk their baby being injured if they fell...really foolish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lillybettybabs Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 She could have given the baby to the nanny and still tottered around in those shoe. She'll get bunions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WitchHazel Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Whatever that poor woman does, she's lambasted for it. If she'd gont out in flatties (or sensible shoes), no doubt the press would have had a field day about how she'd let herself go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ain't Nobody Here Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 I suspect her feet would probably be in that position even if she didn't have shoes on, she's spent so much time in high heels. I dread to think what would happen to the baby if she tripped or went over on her ankle . So irresponsible . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dogmother Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Makes my feet winced just looking at those shoes. 'Half Past Seven' is a wee cute-ster though, isn't she? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinnamon Posted September 16, 2011 Author Share Posted September 16, 2011 Whatever that poor woman does, she's lambasted for it. Perfectly justified IMHO when she is putting a childs life at risk,the daft moo. Harper is really cute - I love the name too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egluntyne Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 She'll get bunions She's already got them apparently. She could be one of those people who have worn high heels for so long that she can't comfortably put her foot flat to the ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowberry Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Yes, I know of a woman who's tendons(?) have been shortened & can only tiptoe when not in high heels; Harper's a cute name & so's the baby! I pity the child as she grows up though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seagazer Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 I know I couldn't walk in those shoes, I only wear heels when we go out and then I need hubby's arm to hold onto. I suppose the only thing is that she always wears them and so probably is quite confident in walking in them. I certainly wouldn't wear heels (especially that high) whilst carrying a baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pips_pekins Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 They are very high and her feet look very uncomfortable in the pictures where she is sitting down. I would be very worried about tripping up with or without a baby but it is an important part of her image I guess as is being seen only when she is back to being so thin after giving birth. I would love her lifestyle and money but I do feel sorry for her. It seems so sad that a woman and mother of her age feels that their image is so important that it seems to take priority over the health and wellbeing of herself and her family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarlettohara Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Apparently named after Harper Lee who she thinks is wonderful - personally I don't think she's ever read a book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsylabrador Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 I have a bunion on my left foot but spent my 20s in a policewoman's flat lace up sensible shoes so I think that's unfair. I like the Beckhams for setting a good example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beach chick Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 I thought she had post-birth back problems, and was only allowed to wear flatties for a while? if that's true, she wont be doing herself any favours... I really dont know how anyone can walk in shoes like that, anything over an inch and I'm teetering maybe its why she never smiles? too worried about falling over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bramble Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 I thought it seemed a bit odd that in the photos where she's sitting down, she seems to be staring at little Harper with her sunglasses on, can't imagine what that must look like from the baby's perspective, think if I wanted to chat to a baby, I'd take my sunnies off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlottechicken Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 Much as I dislike the woman, she's incredibly clever at marketing brand Beckham, and sure knows how to keep in the spotlight The boots with the dress were just plain ugly though, they looked orthopaedic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chucky Mama Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 The shoes so bad for her posture/back etc but I suppose she is a grown up and it's her choice. She can't moan when she's crippled though I certainly wouldn't hold a child wearing something that high, apart from anything they just wouldn't go with my jeans . I suppose the safety thing depends on how often she has fallen over wearing shoes like this. I hope the baby gets to see her smile every now and again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poachedegg Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 It does make me cringe; but then it does when I see anybody walking around in public carrying a tiny baby as when DD was 12 weeks old we visited the in laws and OH carried her from the car on the driveway (fake block paving), slipped on some wet leaves and fell on top of her; after an emergency dash to the hospital (which we shouldn't probably have done ourselves as we were so shocked) and a suspected fractured skull diagnosis which was fortunately wasn't , we were after several hours allowed to take her home - she is a happy cheerful beautiful nearly 10 yr old now , so no harm done - but it was a horrible experience and just goes to show can happen quite easily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ain't Nobody Here Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 What a frightening experience that must have been . Just shows, you can't be too careful when carrying a baby . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
