Jump to content
Janepie33

Daily Mail article. Is it you?!

Recommended Posts

An amusing article, and oh my, that Framebow coop is a thing of beauty, isn't it (Daily Mail article). She does paint a rather negative picture though - you don't HAVE to let them ravage your lawn and destroy everything, and if she kept them in the run a bit more then she wouldn't have the poop problem. I guess it's written for laughs, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An amusing article, and oh my, that Framebow coop is a thing of beauty, isn't it (Daily Mail article). She does paint a rather negative picture though - you don't HAVE to let them ravage your lawn and destroy everything, and if she kept them in the run a bit more then she wouldn't have the poop problem. I guess it's written for laughs, though.

 

 

That and if she kept the eglu door shut the fox wouldn't spook the chickens in the night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosh she is rather smug and up herself isn't she?

 

I was interested to learn that, three years ago, she was one of "the first wave of middle class town dwellers to buy chicken coop and hens"

 

Amazing to learn that chicken keeping amongst the middle classes only started 3 years ago!

 

Much preferred the Guardian article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is with the concept that keeping chickens is middle class?

 

My grandparents kept chickens and raced greyhounds, Grandad was a miner so you can't get more working class than that. I can still remember the smell of meat s"Ooops, word censored!"s being boiled up in the copper to make food for the greyhounds.

 

I have chickens and I am a cleaner.

 

I love my chickens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cripes! This lady seriously wound me up, as did the article the day before about hen keeping in the Daily Mail. That's two mornings in a row my honey-on-toast has almost been spat out in protest as I read the paper! :twisted:

 

I have posted on both stories via their website under my Lovebugette guise, but think they've wound up the comments as they were mainly against the writer! :roll:

 

Firstly, if she had educated herself (here I go again) then she would've understood that hens poo (surprisingly!), dig, eat and are sometimes eaten when not cared for properly. Rats are not a problem if you clear up uneaten s"Ooops, word censored!"s and bring in the Grub every night. :doh:

 

She seems to be a social climber, having to have everything first and then discards it when it's commonplace. She drools over a wooden chicken house when she's got a lovely (cube green) already - how about using the money instead to buy a Cube run from Omlet, or pay her gardener (!?) to build one? No foxy issues - t'da! :dance: Again, no research undertaken or she would realise the Cube is far less likely to attract mites than a wooden "Fearnley" monstrosity!

 

Also, anyone who is photographed in white trousers whilst holding a hen is obviously cluless, we all know that's trouser suicide.

 

I say the the Daily Mail should, along with Omlet perhaps, indulge their readers with truly knowledgable back-yard hen keepers. I for one will be in the queue - I have a husband, 2 children, 3 cats, 8 hens, (4 of which are ex-batts) and a Cube, Walk-in Run, no mites or rats. I somehow manage to pick up their poo without a gardeners assistance and my two boys are able to play football in the garden without too many poo issues (apart from the odd hidden one!) and plenty of plants happily grow with bee's buzzing around them. And all this in a 40ft x 50ft seaside garden.

 

So come on Daily Mail, don't let the negative fashionista reporter have her say without a response from the educated ones! I'm sure my HRT implanted Henrietta GNR would be of more interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't feel too het up about the article. It is funny and I guess it was written mostly for effect. Chickens do trash gardens if they are allowed to and of course they poo. The good thing, as I see it, is that, while not putting off those who really like chickens, the article will put off people who want to be country lasses through maintenance free pets. That's got to be a bonus as anyone wanting a maintenance free chook is bound to be disappointed and then that just results in cruelty and neglect for the poor creature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she was that bothered about her garden, then why didnt she get netting! :doh::roll:

Perhaps if she took preventative measures against rats, it would help.

If she really did love her chickens that much, she wouldnt mind about paying to keep away foxes.

She clearly didnt do any research.

With any animal you have to pay for food, security, housing, but with chickens you get (the best) eggs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be quite awkward if she is/ever on the forum... :anxious::angel:

 

But she does seem very up herself, like 3 years ago was when chickens were invented if she was one of the first keepers...

I agree, the top half of our garden is netted off so they don't trash the flowers & vegetables

 

She seems to be a social climber, having to have everything first and then discards it when it's commonplace.

Thats what I was trying to say, but didn't know how to say it :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with most comments, but...I clear up s"Ooops, word censored!"s and keep my chicken food away a night but the rats still plague me! they just come visiting during theday to store enough up to last them the night...:(.....not so smug here! :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just read the Mail article. It is really funny and very true! I especially like the bit about having to buy more and more stuff for the chickens and it ends up costing a fortune.

 

Now where can I get a goat?

 

Edit - just read the Guardian one too and ended up buying a flipping egg book. See! More money spent! Damn those feathered beasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who writes about being middle class is usually upper class. I get them all the time, they are upper class until it's payment time and they plead poverty with their 5 bed detached and range rovers.

 

Article is biased too.

 

1 put them in a run or build one

2 don't let them roam all over the garden,

3 her costings are exaggerated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...